Satisfyer reacts to Womanizer patent infringement reports

Posted: August 24, 2016

Satisfyer has reacted to reports of a patent dispute in Germany with the makers of the Womanizer, and assured retailers that not only is there no patent infringement but that it fully accepts liability for its products.

Jerome Bensimon, VP of sales at Satisfyer, said: “Satisfyer does not only take their own rights, but also property rights of third parties very seriously. This case is more of a ‘marketing action’ than a serious patent infringement action. From our point of view, the sole purpose of the legal action is to unsettle the market. A lawsuit in that matter is hopeless. There is simply no patent infringement!”

According to Bensimon, the lawsuit relates solely to a previous version of the current Satisfyer Pro 2 – which is no longer produced – and solely to the German market and the alleged infringement cannot be brought to court in any other country besides Germany.

Technical director of Satisfyer, Jörg Budde, added: “All models like the Satisfyer 1, Satisfyer 2, Satisfyer Pro Penguin, Satisfyer Pro Deluxe and Satisfyer Pro 2 have been developed by our own product designers and are therefore based on our own technology. We differentiate ourselves from the patent asserted by Womanizer. Other than required by the patent, the attacked devices do not work with two chambers, but with just a single one. Womanizer has already contacted us some time ago because of an older Satisfyer model and claimed a patent infringement. However, this case was resolved in an out-of-court settlement and we have further amended and improved our product design since then. The mechanism now complained by Womanizer is irrelevant to the function of the device and has been eliminated with the latest product update.”

He continued: “We regret that Womanizer initiated this totally unnecessary lawsuit. We are always seeking dialogue with our competitors instead of employing courts and lawyers. We do not worry about the case: the allegation of patent infringement is completely unfounded and does not even meet the latest generations of our devices. Even the Satisfyer Pro 2 has been updated recently. Thus, there is no danger for retailers. We accept any liability for our devices and do not hide.”

For more information about the company and its products visit